Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 148
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 40-44

Clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing pacemaker implantation


1 Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India
2 Department of Cardiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vilas Yadavarao Kanse
#2 PG Gents Hostel, 5A, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, Manipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4958.158933

Rights and Permissions

Background: The insertion of a permanent cardiac pacemaker is today one of the most commonly performed interventions on the heart. Various hypotheses have been put forward to explain the high incidence of conduction system disorders in the eastern part of our country. We studied the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing pacemaker implantation at the Regional Institute of Medical Science Imphal, Manipur, India. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria and underwent pacemaker implantation were studied. Detailed evaluation was done for each patient. Electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, chest x-ray, lipid profile, and other routine investigations were carried out. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks for any acute complication of pacemaker implantation. Results: Of the 37 patients, 21 (57%) were male, and the mean age of the study group was 63.24 years. The indications for pacemaker implantation were atrioventricular (AV) block [in 24 (64.9%) patients], sick sinus syndrome (SSS) [10 (27.1%)], and trifascicular block [3 (4.5%)]. The most common presenting symptoms were syncope (in 59.9% of patients), lightheadedness (62.2%), palpitation (56.7%), and dyspnea (56.7%). Cardic arrhythmias were associated with hypertension (in 59.5% of patients), diabetes mellitus (21.6%), thyroid disease (16.2%), and coronary heart disease (CAD,13.5%). In 32.4% of the patients there were associated comorbid conditions. No further syncopal attack occurred following pacemaker implantation, and the other symptoms improved significantly. The complications observed were pneumothorax and pacemaker implant site wound exudation in one patient each. Conclusion: The major indications of pacemaker implantation were found to be complete heart block (CHB) and SSS. Pacemaker implantation is a lifesaving procedure and improves quality of life dramatically. Complications associated with pacemaker implantation are relatively low.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1807    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded163    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal