Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 142
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 47-50

A case of retroperitoneal schwannoma and review of literature


Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India

Date of Web Publication17-Jun-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tozo Luwang Thiyam
Lairik Yengbam Awang Lekai, Imphal East - 795 010, Manipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4958.158936

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

The term schwannoma(also known as neurilemmoma) refers to a tumor in which the cells are derived from the neurilemma or the nerve sheath, more commonly referred to as the sheath of Schwann. A retroperitoneal location accounts for 0.3-3.2% of all primary schwannomas and 0.3-6.0% of all retroperitoneal tumors. We report the case of a 47-year-old female with a benign retroperitoneal schwannoma as a rare one.

Keywords: Benign, Schwannoma, Retroperitoneal schwannoma, Tumor Key Messages: Retroperitoneal schwannoma is rare; its preoperative diagnosis is not always possible and complete excision of it is challenging in view of the complex retroperitoneal anatomy


How to cite this article:
Thiyam TL, Wanniang CA, Sharma AD, Haobam MS. A case of retroperitoneal schwannoma and review of literature. J Med Soc 2015;29:47-50

How to cite this URL:
Thiyam TL, Wanniang CA, Sharma AD, Haobam MS. A case of retroperitoneal schwannoma and review of literature. J Med Soc [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 14];29:47-50. Available from: http://www.jmedsoc.org/text.asp?2015/29/1/47/158936


  Introduction Top


The term schwannoma (also known as neurilemmoma)refers to a tumor in which the cells are derived from the neurilemma or the nerve sheath, more commonly referred to as the sheath of Schwann. [1] Schwannoma is a neurogenic tumor usually arising between the third and sixth decades of life, with an equal predilection for men and women. It may occur in any organ or the nerve trunk with the exception of cranial nerves I and II, which lack the Schwann cells. [2] A retroperitoneal location (retroperitoneal schwannomas) accounts for 0.3-3.2% of all primary schwannomas and 0.3-6.0% of all retroperitoneal tumors. [3] Schwannomas are usually benign, but infrequently undergo malignant transformation. [4] Schwannomas usually occur as solitary encapsulated tumors with demarcated margins, with the neighboring organs. [5] The clinical features are nonspecific and depend on the site of location in the retroperitoneum. A correct preoperative diagnosis is difficult to make and these tumors are often misdiagnosed as other soft-tissue lesions occurring in the retroperitoneum. [2] We report the case of a 47-year-old female with a benign retroperitoneal schwannoma as a rare one.


  Case Report Top


A 47-year-old female patient presented with intermittent abdominal pain in her lower abdomen, back pain, and a vague abdominal lump of 10-years.The abdominal pain was independent of activities; it was dull in nature and did not radiate or refer to any other part of the body. There was no history of nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite or weight loss, or any urinary problems. History of constipation and altered bowel habits was present. Systemic examination was within the normal limits. On abdominal examination, a firm, immobile, nontender globular lump was noticed in the hypogastric area. Routine investigations were within the normal limits.Ultrasonography (USG) showed a 10-cm echogenic mass in the retroperitoneal space.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen showed a heterogeneous solid mass of about 9 × 6 × 4 cm in the retroperitoneal space, abutting the bifurcation of the aorta [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. A provisional diagnosis of the retroperitoneal sarcoma was done and surgical exploration was planned. Preliminary examination after laparotomy showed the tumor to be relatively free from surrounding structures; meticulous dissections were done on the common iliac vessels and surrounding structures [Figure 3], and all the feeding vessels were ligated and the tumor was removed.The postoperative course was uneventful. On gross examination, the tumor size was found to be 8 ×6 × 4 cm, with a capsule-like formation [Figure 4]; the cut surface showed a solid smooth grayish white color, with some areas showing cystic changes; no areas of hemorrhage or necrosis was observed [Figure 5]. Histopathological examination showed interlacing bundles and fascicles of the spindle cells having wavy buckled nuclei with prominent Antoni A and Antoni B areas [Figure 6], confirming a schwannoma. The mitotic figures were inconspicuous.
Figure 1: CT scan showing retroperitoneal mass


Click here to view
Figure 2: CECT of the abdomen showing heterogeneous solid mass in the retroperitoneal space, abutting from the bifurcation of the aorta


Click here to view
Figure 3: Mass dissected from the bifurcation of the aorta


Click here to view
Figure 4: Gross feature of the excised mass


Click here to view
Figure 5: Crosssection of the mass showing cystic change


Click here to view
Figure 6: Histopathological slide showing microscopic feature of the schwannoma


Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The retroperitoneal region is a rare location for schwannomas, except in patients having von Recklinghausen disease. It is also noteworthy to mention that malignant degeneration particularly takes place in association with von Recklinghausen disease. [6] In 5-18% of patients, there is an association with von Recklinghausen disease; in most cases, these schwannomas are malignant and tend to be present in multiple forms. [2] Most patients are diagnosed at the age of 25-55 years, but schwannomas can occur at any age. There is no gender predilection. [7]

In a series of 82 cases, Li et al. [8] reported retroperitoneal schwannoma between the ages of 6 months and 70 years. The interval between clinical manifestation and diagnosis ranged from 10 days to 2 years. The main symptoms were abdominal distension (30.5%) and abdominal pain (20.7%); 14.4% of patients were accidentally diagnosed and the others had nonspecific symptoms like backache. [8] In general, since the retroperitoneal space is rather large and flexible, the diagnosis of retroperitoneal schwannoma is often delayed and thus, the lesion reaches a significant size at the time of diagnosis. The most common symptoms are abdominal pain and distension. [6]

A preoperative diagnosis is very difficult to make due to the lack of typical imaging features [e.g., USG, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] that distinguish schwannomas from retroperitoneal malignancies. [9] Due to the presence of many anatomical structures in the retroperitoneum, retroperitoneal schwannomas are easily misdiagnosed as psoas abscesses; pancreatic cysts; or adnexal, renal, or adrenal masses. [2],[7],[10],[11],[12]

Other diagnoses such as paraganglioma, neurofibroma, ganglioneuroma, tumors of mesodermal origin, and retroperitoneal malignancies including malignant fibrous histiocytoma, lymphoma, and liposarcoma should be considered. [9]

On MRI, primary retroperitoneal schwannomas show different signal intensity characteristics, including cystic degeneration. There are, however, no specific characteristics of these tumors. [13]

There are conflicting reports regarding the use of percutaneous USG-or CT-guided biopsies; while some authors recommend them, others object.

Goh et al. [5] state that sometimes, a CT-guided biopsy may be helpful in the determination. But they do not recommend this modality due to the risks of percutaneous biopsy is hemorrhage, infection, and tumor seeding.

Daneshmand et al. [14] state that CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy does not appear to provide an accurate preoperative diagnosis.

In a latest series of 28 cases, Strauss et al. [15] state that cross-sectional imaging combined with a needle biopsy should in all cases provide the correct diagnosis, although they had preoperative diagnosis in only 67.8% of the cases.

With the preoperative assessment of USG-guided fine-needle aspiration, CT, and MRI, the accuracy of diagnosis could definitely be improved and it could later help in the proper planning of excision of the tumor.

Surgical excision is considered the treatment of choice for these tumors. [2],[5],[8] Schwannoma responds poorly to radiation and chemotherapy. [2],[8]

The management options include radiologic surveillance in asymptomatic patients who are diagnosed by cross-sectional imaging combined with a needle biopsy. [15]

Kudo et al. [3] diagnosed three asymptomatic schwannoma using endoscopic USG-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) and followed up the patients without the need of surgical intervention.

There is report of laparoscopic-and robot-assisted resection of the retroperitoneal schwannoma. [16],[17]

The goal of surgical excision should be complete excision as it is not possible to have a preoperative diagnosis; histopathological examination of the excised specimen is only diagnostic in most of the cases. Recurrences have been reported with malignant retroperitoneal schwannoma. [4],[18]

Subtotal resection had been done with preoperative diagnosis of the benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and on close follow-up, recurrence was not seen. [15]

Complete resection of the retroperitoneal schwannoma is challenging due to the presence of adjacent or circumscribing major vessels (that is, the aorta and its branches, the inferior vena cava, and others). [18]

In our case, the tumor had to be resected from the bifurcation of the aorta and the iliac vessels.

Regarding gross appearance, schwannomas are usually solitary, well-circumscribed, firm, and smooth-surfaced tumors. Because of the larger size of the extracranial schwannomas, these are likely to manifest secondary to degenerative changes like cysts and calcifications. [19]

On histological examination, two main microscopic patterns could be recognized: A highly cellular component (Antoni A area) and a myxoid component (Antoni B area). The predominance of one or the other reflects the heterogeneous findings at radiological investigation (CT and MRI). Almost all the schwannomas showed intense immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein, confirming the neuroectodermal origin of the tumor cell. [2]

In our case, we established the diagnosis of retroperitoneal schwannoma after histopathological report of the excised specimen.


  Conclusion Top


To conclude, preoperative diagnosis of retroperitoneal schwannoma is challenging; meticulous dissection is essential for complete excision of the tumor and histopathological examination of the excised tumor is diagnostic for rare retroperitoneal schwannoma as preoperative diagnosis is not possible all the time.

 
  References Top

1.
Foote MN, Luongo V, Marino ER. Benign giant retroperitonealneurilemmoma. Ann Surg 1963;157:719-24.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Tortorelli AP, Rosa F, Papa V, Rotondi V, Sanchez AM, Bossola M, et al. Retroperitoneal schwannomas: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Tumori 2007;93:312-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kudo T, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Ehira N, Yamato H, Eto K, et al. Three cases of retroperitoneal schwannomadiagnosed by EUS-FNA.World J Gastrtoenterol 2011;17:3459-64.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Li ZQ, Wang HY, Li J, Teng L. Recurrent retroperitoneal Schwannomasdisplaying different differentiation from primary tumor: Case report andliterature review. World J Surg Oncol 2010;8:66.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Goh BK, Tan Y, Chung YF, Chow PK, Ooi LL, Wong WK. Retroperitoneal schwannoma. Am J Surg 2006;192:14-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kalayci M, Akyüz U, Demirağ A, Gürses B, Ozkan F, Gökçe O. Retroperitoneal schwannoma: A rare case. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2011;2011:465062.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Oishi K, Itamoto T, Okimoto S, Nishisaka T. Multiple retroperitoneal schwannomas mimicking adrenal tumors. Case Rep Oncol 2012;5:222-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Li Q, Gao C, Juzi JT, Hao X. Analysis of 82 cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:237-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hughes MJ, Thomas JM, Fisher C, Moskovic EC. Imaging features ofretroperitoneal and pelvic schwannomas. Clin Radiol 2005;60:886-93.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ibraheim M, Ikomi A, Khan F. A pelvic retroperitonealschwannoma mimicking an ovarian dermoid cyst in pregnancy.J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:620-1.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Duran B, Guvenal T, Yildiz E, Cetin M, Erden O, Demirkoprulu N. Anunusual cause of adnexal mass: Fallopian tube schwannoma. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:343-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Akiyoshi T, Ueda Y, Yanai K, Yamaguchi H, Kawamoto M, Toyoda K, et al. Melanotic schwannoma of the pancreas: Report of a case. Surg Today 2004;34:550-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hayasaka K, Tanaka Y, Soeda S, Huppert P, Claussen CD. MR findings inprimary retroperitoneal schwannoma. Acta Radiol 1999;40:78-82.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Daneshmand S, Youssefzadeh D, Chamie K, Boswell W, Wu N, Stein JP, et al. Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: A case series and reviewof the literature. Urology 2003;62:993-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Management of benign retroperitoneal schwannomas: A single-center experience. Am J Surg 2011;202:194-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yoshino T, Yoneda K. Laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma: A case report and review of the literature.Anticancer Res2008;28:2889-91.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Abdalla RZ, Garcia RB, DA Costa RI. Robot-assisted resection of a retroperitoneal schwannoma: Case report and review of the literature. Braz J Video-Sur 2013;6:083-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Zhao M, Li X, Wang J, Li W, Huang Z. Retroperitoneal schwannoma treated with percutaneous computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17:173-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cury J, Rafael, Coelho F, Srougi M. Retroperitoneal schwannoma: Case series and literature review.Clinics(Sao Paulo)2007;62:359-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1533    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded128    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]