Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 1001
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 135-139

Reconstruction of the eyelid and periocular region: Our experience


Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication25-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Umesh Kumar
25, BRIJ Enclave, Extension – 1, P.O. Bazardiha, Varanasi - 221 109, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jms.jms_18_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aim: To use periocular flaps for defects involving different zones of eyelid.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted from 2015 to 2017. Twenty four patients with lid defects were managed by cheek rotation and advancement flap(8), Limberg flap(5), forehead flap(5), Mustarde's lid switch flap (3), primary closure(1), SSG(2). Thirteen of our patients suffered from carcinoma, BCC(9) and SCC(4), patients with benign lesions had congenital melanocytic nevi(3), vascular malformation(2), congenital coloboma(3), cleft lower eyelid (1) and post traumatic eyelid defect(2). Eleven patients had full thickness defects and the rest had defect involving the anterior lamella.
Result: Cheek rotation and advancement flap gave good results for anterior lamella, full thickness defect of zone II and adjoining periocular region with inconspicuous scar but ectropion in 2 cases. Limberg flap was used for defect involving lateral part of upper, lower eyelid and canthal region. In one case wound dehiscence occurred. Forehead flap gave linear scar. Mustarde's lid switch flap was an ideal flap giving minimal donor site morbidity. All flaps survived with adequate coverage and uneventful healing.
Conclusion: Periocular flaps are reliable, versatile flaps for reconstruction of all five zones of eyelid with good donor scar, colour and contour match.

Keywords: Chondromucosal graft, lid defects, lid reconstruction, periocular flaps


How to cite this article:
Kumar U, Jain P. Reconstruction of the eyelid and periocular region: Our experience. J Med Soc 2018;32:135-9

How to cite this URL:
Kumar U, Jain P. Reconstruction of the eyelid and periocular region: Our experience. J Med Soc [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 15];32:135-9. Available from: http://www.jmedsoc.org/text.asp?2018/32/2/135/244127


  Introduction Top


Eye, the most important sensory organ of the body, is protected by eyelids which cover it and provide a protective film. Eyelids play an important role in the appearance of an individual. Reconstruction of an eyelid is a challenging task as it requires replacement of specific anatomical structures that have to perform certain functions. It has been made simpler by dividing it into periocular zones, each with individual anatomic, functional, and esthetic considerations.[1],[2]


  Patients and Methods Top


We present a series of 24 patients with eyelid defects who were operated at our department from July 2015 to February 2017. Thirteen patients suffered from carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma (9), and squamous cell carcinoma (4). Patients with benign lesions had congenital melanocytic nevi (3), vascular malformation (2), congenital coloboma (3), cleft of the lower eyelid (1), and posttraumatic eyelid defect (2). Eleven patients had the full-thickness defect and the rest 13 had partial-thickness defect involving only the anterior lamella. The average age of our patients was 39 years (range: 9–76 years).

In eight patients, cheek rotation and advancement flap was used. In five patients, Limberg principle of tissue transposition was followed, and the donor area was primarily closed. In five patients, forehead flap was used. In one of these patients who was a known case of xeroderma pigmentosum, the tumor was 4 cm × 5 cm in size involving the lateral canthus and upper and lower eyelids with adjacent periocular area, for which a laterally based forehead flap was used and the donor area was split skin grafted. In three cases, Mustarde lid switch flap was done for defect in the upper eyelid (25%–50%), and the donor area was primarily closed. In one patient, the defect was <25% of eyelid length and it was primarily closed. For large lesion due to vascular malformations (1) and congenital melanocytic nevi (1), defect was resurfaced with thick split-thickness skin graft (SSG) [Table 1].
Table 1: Site of eyelid and periocular defects and the procedures executed

Click here to view



  Results Top


Cheek rotation and advancement flap gave good results for anterior lamella, full-thickness defect of Zone II, and adjoining periocular region. Donor scar was inconspicuous with tendency of ectropion (2) if the flap was not tugged at the infraorbital region [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Limberg principle of transposition was used when the defect was involving the lateral part of the upper and lower eyelid and canthal regions. Donor scar was kept along the Langer's line, resulting into minimal complaints regarding scars [Figure 3]. In one case, wound dehiscence occurred which was managed conservatively. Forehead flap gave linear scar on forehead when based on supratrochlear artery. In one case, we used laterally based forehead flap where the donor area of the flap was skin grafted. Contour deformity, color mismatch, and dryness were complained by patients in whom a thick skin graft was used to cover the eyelid or the flap donor area. In one case of thick SSG, mild ectropion developed due to lack of proper follow-up. Mustarde lid switch flap was near to ideal flap, giving minimal donor-site morbidity [Figure 4]. The main disadvantage was two-stage procedures. Debulking of forehead flap was done in three patients approximately 6 months after surgery on patients' demand. All the flaps survived with adequate coverage and complete wound healing. In three cases, distal congestion was present which was managed conservatively.
Figure 1: (a) Basal cell carcinoma Zone II (anterior and posterior lamella defects). (b) Reconstruction with cheek flap, buccal mucosa, and auricular cartilage. (c) Postoperative result

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Basal cell carcinoma involving Zone V. (b) Reconstruction with cheek flap. (c) Postoperative result

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) Congenital nevi involving Zones I and IV. (b) Plan of Limberg flap. (c) Reconstruction with Limberg flap. (d) Postoperative result

Click here to view
Figure 4: (a) Congenital coloboma Zone I. (b) Mustarde eyelid switch flap. (c) Postoperative result. (d) Postoperative result

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Eyelid defects can be congenital, posttraumatic, or may result after excision of tumors. Irrespective of the etiology, the defect must be evaluated depending on the zone or zones which it is involving and whether the defect is involving the anterior or the posterior lamella of the eyelid or both. The quality and quantity of locoregional and distant tissues are evaluated. Defects created by an ablative procedure may not be amenable to reconstruction and may be reconstructed after permanent pathological confirmation regarding adequate margin.[3] Any plan for adjuvant treatment such as radiation should also be considered. Eyelid defects resulting from trauma rarely occur in isolation. It is important to ensure that all associated injuries have been properly identified and accounted for.

During reconstruction of defects of the eyelid, the following steps were followed:

  • Size of defect and loss of function were assessed
  • Complete preoperative ophthalmologic examination was done
  • Maintained symmetry with contralateral structure
  • Excision of small lesion was done by giving incision in a pentagon. Base of the pentagon was toward the eyelid margin
  • While approximating eyelid margins, alignment of all layers was achieved
  • Suture material and knots were placed to avoid direct contact with the surface of the cornea and globe
  • Principles of reconstructive ladder were followed.


Adequate soft-tissue coverage of the eyelid and periocular region is particularly important because of the complexity of form and function of the region. Flaps are necessary for coverage of exposed cornea, sclera, tarsal plate, or conjunctiva. Evaluation and treatment of eyelid defects are best approached by dividing the region into zones each with its own anatomic, functional, and esthetic considerations.[4],[5] Evaluation of defects with respect to the location or zone and the extent to which each zone is affected (anterior or posterior lamella or both) may also be predictive of possible postreconstructive complications. These zones are upper eyelid (Zone I), lower eyelid (Zone II), medial canthal region (Zone III), lateral canthal region (Zone IV), and periocular region (Zone V).

Various types of flaps can be used depending on the location, nature, and size of the defect. Reconstruction with local flaps has the following advantages:

  • Excellent tissue match
  • Minimal donor-site deformity
  • Reconstruction of anterior and posterior lamella in eyelid switch procedure
  • Simultaneous reconstruction of canthal and eyelid defects.


Reconstruction with regional flaps has several disadvantages as follows:

  • Poorly matched flap skin in color, texture, and thickness
  • Compromised eyelid function
  • Considerable discomfort to patient due to immobilization
  • Scar and deformity at the donor site.


Partial-thickness defects involving skin and muscle are divided into two categories: those <50% of eyelid length are managed by local advancement, rotation, and transposition flaps and the scars when possible are oriented in transverse direction and defects >50% in eyelid length are conventionally managed by full-thickness graft, which is harvested from contralateral upper eyelid,[6],[7],[8] postauricular region, and lower part of the neck or lateral groin region. The donor area is primarily closed. When a defect is resurfaced with a full-thickness graft or a thick SSG, there is definitive color and contour mismatch as compared with the surrounding area. Chances of ectropion of the upper or lower eyelid as a complication in the early and late postoperative periods cannot be ruled out. To overcome these problems, we have opted for thin flap from the periocular region which was used for reconstruction of partial-thickness defects as an alternative option.

Cheek rotation flap was successfully used for reconstruction of partial-thickness as well as full-thickness defects of Zone II as well as Zone V defects. The scar marks of the donor as well as recipient areas were inconspicuous and gave excellent esthetic results, particularly in elderly patients. This flap can be used in isolation or in combination with eyelid switch flaps for reconstruction of the upper and lower eyelid defects.[9],[10],[11]

Limberg flap is routinely used for defects in the face, pressure sores, and pilonidal sinuses of the sacral region.[12],[13] Limberg flap is a versatile procedure in terms of design and surgical execution and was used for small-to-medium sized defects of Zone I, Zone II, Zone IV, and Zone V. The arterial supply of the Limberg flap is through the subdermal plexus. The random pattern supply permits flap layout in any configuration. Excision of defect was planned in a rhombic fashion. The minor angle should be kept at 60° for optimal Limberg flap transfer. The flap was oriented so that the donor-site scar fell into the lines of maximal extensibility. As wound closure was achieved, normal skin tension was restored. This flap is an excellent option for small-to-medium sized defects with minimal donor-site scar for defects in the eyelid and periocular region.

For full-thickness defects up to half of the upper eyelid, we used skin muscle tarsoconjunctival (Esser) flap from the lower to upper eyelid which was not more than one-quarter of its width (approximately 6–7 mm) so that the lower eyelid (donor flap) defect was primarily closed. Division of the pedicle was done 3 weeks later. This flap can be used for defects between half- and three-quarters of the upper eyelid as well as for subtotal and total defects of the upper eyelid in combination with cheek rotation flap for lower-eyelid reconstruction. This is an ideal procedure by which anterior and posterior lamella are reconstructed simultaneously with achievement of functional eyelid.[14],[15] Forehead flaps based on supratrochlear vessel or laterally based on anterior branch of superficial temporal artery can provide significant amount of tissues for reconstruction of defects resulting from excision of large tumors of eyelid involving Zones III, IV, and V. They are robust flaps with good vascularity.[16] The main disadvantages are two-stage surgery and donor-site morbidity. In all the above-mentioned flaps used for reconstruction of either the upper or lower eyelid, septal cartilage with mucosa, buccal mucosa, or palatal mucosal graft was used for lining. Debulking of flaps can always be done approximately 6 months after surgery if the patient so desires.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Carraway JH. Reconstruction of the eyelids and correction of ptosis of the eyelid. In: Aston SJ, Beasly RW, Thorne CH editors. Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery 5th ed. New York: Lippincot Raven; 1997. p. 529-544.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Spinelli HM, Jelks GW. Periocular reconstruction: A systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:1017-24.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hayano SM, Whipple KM, Korn BS, Kikkawa DO. Principles of periocular reconstruction following excision of cutaneous malignancy. J Skin Cancer 2012;2012:438502.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Jackson IT, Eyelid and canthal region reconstruction. Local Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. St. Loius: Quality Medical Publishing; 2002. p. 273-326.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Meissner M, Hofmann W, Kaufmann R. Reconstructing of the upper eyelid: Full thickness skin grafting between the same contralateral aesthetic units. J Ger Soc Dermatol (JDDG) 2016;14:319-20.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mustardé JC. Reconstruction of eyelids. Ann Plast Surg 1983;11:149-69.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Spinelli HM, Forman DL. Current treatment of post-traumatic deformities. Residual orbital, adnexal, and soft-tissue abnormalities. Clin Plast Surg 1997;24:519-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Limberg AA. Design of local flaps. In: Gibson TA, editor. Modern Trends in Plastic Surgery. London: Butterworth; 1966. p. 38-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Spinelli HM, Suzman MS. Soft tissue deformities in orbital trauma evaluation and repair of medial and lateral canthal injury. J Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;8:249-58.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Spinelli HM, Atlas of Aesthetic Eyelid and Periocular Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spinelli HM, Sherman JE, Lisman RD, Smith B. Human bites of the eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:610-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lister GD, Gibson T. Closure of rhomboid skin defects: The flaps of Limberg and Dufourmentel. Br J Plast Surg 1972;25:300-14.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Koss N. The mathematics of flaps. In: Basic Science in Plastic Surgery an Educational Foundation Symposium. St. Louis: Mosby; 1979. p. 274-83.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Subramanian N. Reconstructions of eyelid defects. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:5-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Giuseppe DA, Albert YW. Hard palate graft for repair of eyelid notch deformity. Vis Pan Am 2015;14:58-60.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mustarde JC. Repair and Reconstruction of the Orbital Region. 2nd ed., Ch. 9,7,11. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 1980.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed95    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded17    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]