Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 76
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 36-38

Perception of postgraduate students on teaching aids


Department of Physiology, Regional Institutes of Medical Sciences, Imphal, India

Correspondence Address:
Sarada Ningthoujam
Department of Physiology, Regional Institutes of Medical Sciences, Imphal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4958.116633

Rights and Permissions

Aim: To obtain feedback from the postgraduate students on their perception of various lecture delivery methods use in Regional Institutes of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted among the postgraduate students in RIMS. A questionnaire was circulated among 109 randomly selected postgraduate students from different departments and was asked to tick appropriately the teaching aids and the methods, which were preferred. Results: The majority of the postgraduate students (66.05%) preferred power point (PPT) presentation, while 22.21% of the students preferred the lecture using blackboard (BB) and 11.73% preferred overhead projector transparency (OHPT) for teaching. Some important comments of the students were also recorded. Conclusion: The postgraduate students clearly preferred the use of PPT presentation over the other methods. It also appears that in the hands of a trained teacher, any teaching aid would be appropriate and effective.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2057    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal